A CNIPA refusal is not the end. We analyze the examiner's reasoning, prepare compelling arguments, and file a professional appeal to overturn rejections.
Request Case ReviewCNIPA examiners typically refuse applications on one or more of these grounds. We know how to counter each one.
The examiner considers your mark descriptive or generic. We present evidence of acquired distinctiveness through long-term use and market recognition.
The examiner found a prior mark that is similar. We analyze differences in goods/services, visual appearance, and consumer perception to argue distinguishability.
The mark contains a geographical name. We demonstrate that consumers do not associate the mark with the place, or that the name has acquired secondary meaning.
The examiner considers the mark misleading about quality, origin, or characteristics. We submit evidence showing truthful use and consumer understanding.
Goods/services description is too vague or incorrectly classified. We revise and clarify the specification to meet CNIPA requirements.
The examiner cites prohibitive clauses. We argue statutory interpretation and precedent to show the mark does not violate these provisions.
Every appeal is built on a solid foundation of legal arguments and supporting evidence.
Deep-dive analysis of the examiner's reasoning, identifying logical gaps, factual errors, and legal misinterpretations.
Collect sales data, advertising materials, market surveys, and registration certificates from other jurisdictions as supporting proof.
Professional legal brief addressing each refusal ground, citing relevant Trademark Law articles and CNIPA trademark review precedents.
If a hearing is scheduled, we prepare you thoroughly with mock Q&A and attend as your authorized representative.
65% of properly argued CNIPA appeals result in reversal. You have 30 days — let's prepare your case.
+86 138-3949-0337